a friend of mine, who is a nice , charming, erudiite and helpful fellow, (unlike me) once exclaimed, "I've never met a jew who didnt hate my guts either on sight, or from the moment i greeted them". I did not believe him, until i saw him in action at university. it was true. he only needed to ask a single question and the jews (save one) would hiss and grind their teeth. and he is as celtic as triskeles and kilts and menhirs and bronze buckles. both in appearance, and character. as you have indicated, the jew hates the celt instinctively, but it isnt for knocking down a few buildings, it's because the true celt is more handsome, smarter, and most certainly kinder than the jew, and when they see one, they hate him immediately.
i'm guessing youre not as gay as you make yourself out to be. not that i care. 🐸. im oreparinf a few poasts. somehow, thee mild treatises take hours to go through.. i wonder why
I'm old enough to remember when everyone in the LG community was freaking out about adding the "B". I'd love to be a fly on the fall listening to what long-standing members of the community truly think about adding the "T".
The idea that Rome was actually in the East and that Italian Rome was a medieval fabrication makes a lot of sense and you're definitely not the only writer thinking along these lines.
GT, I really love this stuff but I have to admit I get a bit lost in the details. Have you ever considered putting all of your essays on this topic into a book, in some kind of order that would help luddites like me sort everything out in one go?
I wanted to ask you this on an earlier post, but it is appropriate here, too. You put a lot of stuff on the plate and I want to be sure I'm following. Was Paul religiously sincere in what he was putting out there or did he have a hidden agenda?
Paul is the missing link between early Judaism and Roman Christianity. If the New Testament were arranged in chronological order, Paul would be first and Acts would be last. Acts is the culmination of historicizing Paul's Christ. Paul says he laid the foundation of Christ and that others will be building on it. This statement, I believe.
I essentially regard Paul as insincere, since he boasts about becoming different things to different people to get what he wants. He criticizes Jewish fanaticism; but he also draws his theology from the Jewish Bible and requests tribute from the Goyim for Jerusalem. Christ is the Jewish king after all, and Paul wants money. I think he sincerely cares about Judaism.
As I have elsewhere noted, moving Christ from Earth to Heaven is a very smart and practical reformation of Jewish thought, and Paul should be credited for it. But when we think of Paul's piety, it's not about turning the other cheek. Paul says you love your enemy in order to heap coals on his head. He is quoting the morality of the Jewish Bible.
Paul isn't even a Jewish name, which is why he had to be retconned into "Saul" in Acts, also the name of the first Jewish messiah. As far as I know nobody knew about Paul until he was published by Marcion along with the "Gospel of the Lord", which is closely related to Luke. All we really know is that, in terms of literary evolution, Paul links the Septuagint to the synoptic gospels, and all these texts were originally published in Greek.
Paul comes from the Greek "Paulos" which means "small one" - a name befitting a man who constantly insults his own body. Compare Paul to Athena's nickname, Pallas, meaning "little maiden". Supposedly the name Paul and its meaning comes originally from Latin but by now I think we should know better.
If I remember correctly, the Bolsheviks were exceptionally murderous toward the Galicians--ostensibly in response to some "betrayal"--their word.
There's been this millennia-long war going on, but only one side knows it, thanks to the vast amount of history that's hidden from us. I wonder why they still haven't achieved final victory given our side is fighting blindfolded and in the dark.
I had to fix some significant errors in this post.
a friend of mine, who is a nice , charming, erudiite and helpful fellow, (unlike me) once exclaimed, "I've never met a jew who didnt hate my guts either on sight, or from the moment i greeted them". I did not believe him, until i saw him in action at university. it was true. he only needed to ask a single question and the jews (save one) would hiss and grind their teeth. and he is as celtic as triskeles and kilts and menhirs and bronze buckles. both in appearance, and character. as you have indicated, the jew hates the celt instinctively, but it isnt for knocking down a few buildings, it's because the true celt is more handsome, smarter, and most certainly kinder than the jew, and when they see one, they hate him immediately.
It helps when you're not banging your cousins in a quest to be the chosen people.
i'm guessing youre not as gay as you make yourself out to be. not that i care. 🐸. im oreparinf a few poasts. somehow, thee mild treatises take hours to go through.. i wonder why
I'm old enough to remember when everyone in the LG community was freaking out about adding the "B". I'd love to be a fly on the fall listening to what long-standing members of the community truly think about adding the "T".
The idea that Rome was actually in the East and that Italian Rome was a medieval fabrication makes a lot of sense and you're definitely not the only writer thinking along these lines.
GT, I really love this stuff but I have to admit I get a bit lost in the details. Have you ever considered putting all of your essays on this topic into a book, in some kind of order that would help luddites like me sort everything out in one go?
When my theses are complete, I will nail them to a door.
I wanted to ask you this on an earlier post, but it is appropriate here, too. You put a lot of stuff on the plate and I want to be sure I'm following. Was Paul religiously sincere in what he was putting out there or did he have a hidden agenda?
Paul is the missing link between early Judaism and Roman Christianity. If the New Testament were arranged in chronological order, Paul would be first and Acts would be last. Acts is the culmination of historicizing Paul's Christ. Paul says he laid the foundation of Christ and that others will be building on it. This statement, I believe.
I essentially regard Paul as insincere, since he boasts about becoming different things to different people to get what he wants. He criticizes Jewish fanaticism; but he also draws his theology from the Jewish Bible and requests tribute from the Goyim for Jerusalem. Christ is the Jewish king after all, and Paul wants money. I think he sincerely cares about Judaism.
As I have elsewhere noted, moving Christ from Earth to Heaven is a very smart and practical reformation of Jewish thought, and Paul should be credited for it. But when we think of Paul's piety, it's not about turning the other cheek. Paul says you love your enemy in order to heap coals on his head. He is quoting the morality of the Jewish Bible.
Paul isn't even a Jewish name, which is why he had to be retconned into "Saul" in Acts, also the name of the first Jewish messiah. As far as I know nobody knew about Paul until he was published by Marcion along with the "Gospel of the Lord", which is closely related to Luke. All we really know is that, in terms of literary evolution, Paul links the Septuagint to the synoptic gospels, and all these texts were originally published in Greek.
Paul comes from the Greek "Paulos" which means "small one" - a name befitting a man who constantly insults his own body. Compare Paul to Athena's nickname, Pallas, meaning "little maiden". Supposedly the name Paul and its meaning comes originally from Latin but by now I think we should know better.
Namaste
If I remember correctly, the Bolsheviks were exceptionally murderous toward the Galicians--ostensibly in response to some "betrayal"--their word.
There's been this millennia-long war going on, but only one side knows it, thanks to the vast amount of history that's hidden from us. I wonder why they still haven't achieved final victory given our side is fighting blindfolded and in the dark.
The Occidental Observer posted a really good piece on Ashkenazi Jews a few days ago. You might find it interesting:
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/02/08/a-theory-of-khazars-and-ashkenazi-jews/