Christianity represents the fulfillment of the Jewish Bible, also known as the Old Testament: a fanciful history of the kings of Jerusalem in the land of Judah.
Perhaps you're being too harsh on Guyenot: his stuff is admittedly "speculative", but there's persuasive evidence that
(a) a VAST amount of Church history is rank fabrication (in keeping with the largely-fictional books of nonsense on which the entire edifice rests); and
(b) the global upheaval that began in the mid 6th century gave opportunists the opening to do their own "Great Reset", including wholesale forgery of huge chunks of history - resulting in a chain of forgeries which, when picked apart, leave a 300 year lacuna in recorded history.
Most folks - even those aware of the Late Bronze Age Collapse of the early 12th century BCE - are ignorant of the scale of the events of 535-540 CE, during which the sunlight reaching Earth was reduced globally (probably by a MASSIVE eruption of Krakatoa, several orders of magnitude greater than the famous 19th century one).
It was probably the single most important event of the first millennium, and its effects led to social upheaval from China to Europe to the Levant to Mesoamerica.
The story of Muhammed is also a retelling of the story of Joshua.
The early Muhammadens were actually Christians worshipping a version of Jesus that was more in line with Joshua. Mark tries to repudiate the idea of the messiah being a kind of warlord second coming of Joshua by portraying his Joshua as a peace-preacher. Some sects clearly didn't agree with his interpretation, and these became Muslims.
Furthermore, we have coins depicting Muhammed with a Cross.
If we revisit the chronology and remove fake centuries, we find that the rise of Islam follows shortly on the heels of the taking of Jerusalem by Titus. It becomes a revenge-quest to take back the lands conquered by Rome. They succeed shortly after and proceed to wage war on Rome for centuries.
Thanks for all your comments, they are very helpful. I first got into this kind of revisionism based on Guyenot's coverage of Gunnar Heinsohn. So I started looking in ancient history, trying to find a solid starting point, and mostly encountered quicksand. Turtles all the way down. We are taught to think of "info war" as a new thing. But "info war" is totally redundant.
Very interesting, as always GT.
Incidentally, do you know if there is a connection between the PX symbol and the modern day RX symbol for prescriptions? PX = CHI RO = XR = RX?
Perhaps you're being too harsh on Guyenot: his stuff is admittedly "speculative", but there's persuasive evidence that
(a) a VAST amount of Church history is rank fabrication (in keeping with the largely-fictional books of nonsense on which the entire edifice rests); and
(b) the global upheaval that began in the mid 6th century gave opportunists the opening to do their own "Great Reset", including wholesale forgery of huge chunks of history - resulting in a chain of forgeries which, when picked apart, leave a 300 year lacuna in recorded history.
Most folks - even those aware of the Late Bronze Age Collapse of the early 12th century BCE - are ignorant of the scale of the events of 535-540 CE, during which the sunlight reaching Earth was reduced globally (probably by a MASSIVE eruption of Krakatoa, several orders of magnitude greater than the famous 19th century one).
It was probably the single most important event of the first millennium, and its effects led to social upheaval from China to Europe to the Levant to Mesoamerica.
The story of Muhammed is also a retelling of the story of Joshua.
The early Muhammadens were actually Christians worshipping a version of Jesus that was more in line with Joshua. Mark tries to repudiate the idea of the messiah being a kind of warlord second coming of Joshua by portraying his Joshua as a peace-preacher. Some sects clearly didn't agree with his interpretation, and these became Muslims.
Furthermore, we have coins depicting Muhammed with a Cross.
If we revisit the chronology and remove fake centuries, we find that the rise of Islam follows shortly on the heels of the taking of Jerusalem by Titus. It becomes a revenge-quest to take back the lands conquered by Rome. They succeed shortly after and proceed to wage war on Rome for centuries.
Thanks for all your comments, they are very helpful. I first got into this kind of revisionism based on Guyenot's coverage of Gunnar Heinsohn. So I started looking in ancient history, trying to find a solid starting point, and mostly encountered quicksand. Turtles all the way down. We are taught to think of "info war" as a new thing. But "info war" is totally redundant.