I hesitate to use the “L” word, since like so many other words it has become loaded, but in the United States of America, liberalism is conservative, and conservatism is liberal. The Constitution remains the most liberal law in human history.
Those who want to infringe American rights to speech, association, arms, and privacy cannot by definition be liberal, no matter what they call themselves. In fact they would be totalitarians. When we talk about freedom of speech, it’s about more than art, satire or “hate”; it includes the philosophy of science itself. The scientific method cannot function without freedom of expression.
We witnessed this during COVID. Scientific dissent was smothered in order to enact a technocratic agenda. We saw the CDC manipulate pandemic statistics, and thus the narrative, in real time. A brand new vaccine platform carrying instructions for a genetically engineered bioweapon was waived past clinical trials with zero accountability and foisted into the bodies of billions of people. Highly dubious NPIs were enforced, people gagged and isolated against their will, lifelong businesses forced to close under the weight of a flattened curve.
I am getting off topic here. I wrote this essay to say that anti Semitism is inherently liberal. Proving it is easy! First we need to agree on what a Semite is:
SEMITE: “Originally [since 1598 in English]: a member of any of the peoples mentioned in Genesis 10:21–31 as descended from Shem, one of the sons of Noah, traditionally interpreted as including the Hebrews, Aramaeans, Assyrians, and Arabs. Subsequently also: a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language.” -Oxford English Dictionary
Okay, so there are two possible meanings of Semite. One, a fictional tribe. Two, a group of languages named after that tribe. How do we know Semites were fictional? Because they come from the book of Genesis. In fact Genesis tells us that the Semites possess a special privilege: the right to rule over their cousins, the Canaanites. Canaan was the name of the promised land before it was Israel or Palestine. Semitism is the beginning of the delusion of a “promised land” for a “chosen people”.
So if I oppose the idea that the native inhabitants of the “promised land” were cursed to serve their own cousins, I am an anti Semite? So be it. I do not hate anyone because of their race or lack thereof. But Semites are not a race. They are a fiction. Every time some diabolical Jew calls somebody an anti Semite, they are accusing them of racial hatred. This is called projection. Even Jews that are supposedly “reformed” can’t stop crying about anti Semitism. But the Jewish race is a pernicious religious fiction and if you believe in it then you have not reformed yourself at all.
One of the founders of the United States, Thomas Paine, became very outspoken against the Bible later in life, in the midst of the French Revolution. In The Age of Reason, he describes the Jewish Bible (old testament) in these ways:
“It would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon, than the word of God. It is a history of wickedness, that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind; and, for my part, I sincerely detest it, as I detest everything that is cruel.”
“Whence arose all the horrid assassinations of whole nations of men, women, and infants, with which the Bible is filled; and the bloody persecutions, and tortures unto death and religious wars, that since that time have laid Europe in blood and ashes; whence arose they, but from this impious thing called revealed religion, and this monstrous belief that God has spoken to man?”
“The character of Moses, as stated in the Bible, is the most horrid that can be imagined. If those accounts be true, he was the wretch that first began and carried on wars on the score or on the pretence of religion; and under that mask, or that infatuation, committed the most unexampled atrocities that are to be found in the history of any nation.”
“Among the detestable villains that in any period of the world have disgraced the name of man, it is impossible to find a greater than Moses, if this account be true. Here is an order to butcher the boys, to massacre the mothers, and debauch the daughters.”
“The Bible tells us, that those assassinations were done by the express command of God. And to read the Bible without horror, we must undo every thing that is tender, sympathising, and benevolent in the heart of man. Speaking for myself, if I had no other evidence that the Bible is fabulous, than the sacrifice I must make to believe it to be true, that alone would be sufficient to determine my choice.”
-Thomas Paine, https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/1018077-the-age-of-reason-being-an-investigation-of-true-and-fabulous-theology
In his rejection of the Bible, Paine was not an atheist, but a deist. This is the true religion of the United States of America: belief in a God that is known outside of the Bible. Deism is the very spirit of the European enlightenment and it is what is at stake in the world’s struggle against Zionist occupation. We must not lose sight of God itself - only of YHWH and his imaginary Semites.
And we really need to find a new name for “Semitic” languages.
=== Those who want to infringe American rights to speech, association, arms, and privacy cannot by definition be liberal, no matter what they call themselves. ===
This is particularly salient on the Top Hemisphere of the planet, where "Liberal" is the name of the primary CONSERVATIVE Party.
The other main "conservative" party - without which the "Liberal" Party has seldom been able to form government - refers to itself as the "National" Party.
In reality, the "National" Party represents agribusiness. In some States the "Nationals" also sometimes refer to themselves as the "Country Party", or the "National Country Party".
It's a dog's breakfast as far as nomenclature is concerned, but the brute fact is that absolutely none of them gives the slightest fuck about the populace at large.
We the Livestock exist to enrich the political class and their hangers-on (oligarchs, bureaucrats etc) and once we're spent we're supposed to just die - preferably quietly, and preferably out of view, off in a corner somewhere.
They've spent three generations quietly poisoning us - feminising the menfolk and putting women (who are objectively stupider than men - by 0.5σ*) in senior administrative and bureaucratic roles.
Since women are a bit stupider than men, they much more easily scared... so they are easy to convince that infringing on everyone else's personal liberties is entirely justified in order for these dysfunctional harridans to feel "safe".
And when they're encouraged to believe that they should feel "unsafe" if confronted with any non-milquetoast disagreement with their infatuation du jour, they feel justified in agitating for, implementing, and enforcing the most ILLIBERAL policies imaginable.
The hilarious thing is that the actual ENFORCERS - the armed, costumed, high-school under-performers that comprise the police forces - are mostly men. Worse: they're mostly WHITE men within 0.5σ of median intelligence.
These traitors - to their own sex; their own class; and their people - mostly don't actually believe in the rightness of their job. They do it for a paycheck, and are also titillated by the power to lord it over people who were better then them at school AND at sports.
I've used σ* to indicate the standard deviation of the distribution of IQ in white females (with is roughly 14); the female mean is about 94. The male mean and sd are 100 and 15, respectively.
That means that men outnumber women 10 to 1 at IQs above 135 - which is why so few women excel in STEM. Like bureacurats and politicians, the vast bulk of allegedly "smart" women are midwits, is what I'm saying - and midwits are the wrong people to run society.
Three cheers from me, a long-time deist ! This essay says it all so well I might as well print off a few copies and hand them out rather than trying to argue with anybody.