In her book Doppelganger (2023), left wing Jewish polemicist Naomi Klein tells the sad story of how she came to be confused with right wing Jewish polemicist Naomi Wolf. The tragedy of this Semitic double vision was that while Klein held valid opinions on topics such as climate change, COVID vaccines, anti racism, the 2020 election, and “Russian aggression”, Wolf did not. In the following quote, Klein summarizes her world view, in which hot weather serves as proof of anthropogenic global warming:
“Grounding those space-faring billionaires and using their ill-gotten wealth to pay for housing and health care and getting off fossil fuels before the future is one protracted heat dome. Or, more modestly, sending your shark-identified child to elementary school without fearing that they will come home with a highly contagious and potentially lethal virus that they contracted from a classmate whose parents believe that vaccines are part of a plot to commit genocide and enslave humanity because some lady on the internet named Naomi convinced them.”
-Naomi Klein, Doppelganger
Note, her attitude toward COVID is ruled by fear. She tells us how she would fix the world if she were commissar. She criticizes Wolf’s opposition to vaccines as unfounded conspiracy theories. But guess what? If Naomi Klein is the scientist, and Naomi Wolf is the troll, then it is Klein’s obligation to utilize the scientific method. With COVID, the scientific method was cast aside for the sake of national security. Thus there is no proof for her to indicate. All supporting data is ex post facto and ambiguous. Klein allowed herself to be injected with a new nanotechnological medical platform carrying genetic instructions for an engineered bioweapon.
So I have questions for Klein. When did you start masking, based on what evidence? When did you start socially isolating, based on what evidence? When did you get injected with a classified nanoparticle cocktail that was only tested for 2 months, based on what evidence? Klein complains that people were “doing their own research” on COVID. But what was the alternative, when Pfizer’s research was a hasty fraud? The most Pfizer’s “Warp Speed” clinical trial showed was that the vaccine reduced your chance of testing positive for COVID by 95% after 7 days. But it also showed the vaccine was associated with a 20% increased risk of dying, indefinitely.
Klein does admit to a few adverse reactions:
“There are risks to every vaccine (and indeed any medical procedure or medication) and these reports of harmful reactions, even if confirmed, in no way negate the value or importance of getting vaccinated: Covid itself still represented a far more significant health risk for the population at large”.
Here she falsely conflates vaccines and other medicines, although only vaccines are considered “unavoidably unsafe” and exempted from liability as well as rigorous blinded research standards. And those were the old vaccines, the ones that took a decade to develop instead of a few warped months. Klein says COVID “represented” rather than “presented” a health risk - perhaps a Freudian slip. Later she says “the faker is the one hiding behind representation”. And she states the beneficiary of the vaccines as the collective public, completely ignoring individual health and rights.
But she’s still wrong! Pfizer’s clinical trial showed 20% excess mortality among the vaxxed, a result which has been grimly recreated across the entire vaccinated world. Instead of engaging with Pfizer’s clinical research, Klein’s best scientific argument is: “in April 2022, researchers estimated that a quarter of the one million American deaths from Covid-19 ‘could have been prevented with primary series vaccination.’” Well, how was that estimate made? Isn’t that an unfalsifiable thesis? And by April 2022, hadn’t people been injecting themselves with the magic Trump juice for over a year? Aren’t we supposed to prove a brand new technology is safe before we put it in 5 billion human bodies? She should know, since her communist father ran “large randomized control trials” for a Canadian university.
Klein blames vaccine hesitancy on the MSM’s refusal to acknowledge any risk from the vaccines at all, saying “editors and journalists steer clear of important topics for fear that their audiences can’t cope with complex truths”. But again this is false! COVID censorship was imposed top down by the federal government, as well as sideways by globalist corporate policy. Klein describes Trump’s COVID response as “murderous mismanagement” despite Trump’s enabling of her precious vaccine. Meanwhile her only criticism of Big Pharma is that they profited too much from their wonder drugs. She regards masks, emergency vaccines, and social restrictions as legitimate public health measures. She describes herself as “a third generation leftist who believes freedom is won collectively and gets itchy around flags”.
Why does Klein want us to believe that public health, unlike every other postmodern institution, is outside the clutches of transnational capital? Klein writes, “The structural critiques of capitalism are gone, and in their place are discombobulated conspiracies that somehow frame deregulated capitalism as communism in disguise”. Deregulated capitalism??? Where?? From my vantage I see a fraudulent economy propped up by worthless legal tender that was designed for debasement and inflation. This economy was actually imposed on us by an early left wing institution called the Federal Reserve. I see federal taxes, state taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, licenses, and health insurance taken away from citizens under threat of force in the name of socialism. Does any of that count as deregulated? Where is the free trade?
In truth, capitalism is highly regulated by the globalists. That is in fact how you know they are communists, because some pigs are more equal than others. Klein calls capitalism “a system that must enclose all aspects of life inside the market in order to mine them as new profit centers”. But socialism and communism are merely the consolidation of authority over capital. They also enclose human beings. What happened after the Bolshevik revolution, did the proletariat wander off to lead bucolic lives in the fields? No, they were thrown into Ford factories.
As long as the means of production exist, they will enclose people. And the alternative is a lack of civilization. The only retreat from enclosure is Luddism. Yet modern socialists and communists find themselves at the opposite end of the spectrum, promising a technocratic AI utopia. Socialism and communism are the uncanny doppelgangers of capitalism; they are reformed expressions of the exact same greed. Capitalism is not a problem per se; monopoly of capital is a problem. But monopoly of capital is exactly what socialism and communism require.
Klein focuses on Steve Bannon as some kind of diabolical supervillain who dreams of equality under the law, which as far as I know is basically accurate. But Klein also notes, “Bannon has a dedicated ‘transhumanism’ correspondent whose sole role appears to be to scare listeners with accounts of the many ways that technology companies dream of an ‘upgraded’ humanity aided by implants, robotics, and gene splicing.” Come again? Transhumanism is a documented goal of the U.S. military, the same people who took unilateral control during the COVID state of emergency.
The ingredients of the Pfizer Biontech vaccine have never been disclosed; in fact the FDA approved a Pfizer vaccine doppelganger called Comirnaty. A nano material called graphene oxide is said to be an excellent vaccine adjuvant and could easily be in the EUA shots along with lipid nanoparticles, RNA and DNA fragments, and perhaps other adjuvants including metals. Graphene and these fellow nano components can combine to form hydrogels: increasingly sophisticated transhuman interfaces that assemble themselves inside the human body. The technology is here and now.
Regarding the origin of SARS2, Klein writes “I do realize, in retrospect, that I was too quick to take the official story—that it came from a wet market where wild animals were sold—at face value. If I’m honest, I accepted it because it served my own motivated reasoning and reinforced my worldview.” Unfortunately, Klein is content to write her book without backing up her preconceived claims with data. She is the one who must prove what she says is real. I do not have to prove her claims are unreal in order for her to be discredited by her own lack of principles. If proof is what matters, then why is it lacking from her book? Trusting and making assertions is not the nature of science or reason. It’s the nature of shock doctrine.
Klein made her name writing about trauma based mind control, which she calls “shock doctrine”. She believes that demagogic “disaster capitalists” utilize “large scale shocks” (like 9/11) to “scramble our collective synapses”. She says, “With the public terrified and distracted, power hungry players were able to move in and ram through policies that benefited corporate elites without debate or consent.” However, Klein’s thesis rejects the possibility of conspiracy; in her world, disasters are never planned; rather, emergencies are exploited. Why she thinks the evil disaster capitalists would never plan a false flag emergency is beyond me. Especially since they literally planned the COVID pandemic at Event 201 the month before it showed up in Wuhan.
Klein says about COVID: “Controlling the virus forced on many of us, including me, the very conditions that make humans most vulnerable to states of shock”. OK, so she admits that COVID countermeasures were imposed by force in the wake of disaster, and admits that these countermeasures further traumatized the populace, thus priming us for “disaster capitalism”. But she’s on the same side as the political and corporate demagogues raining down moralized turns of phrase on the public in place of trustworthy data? After she ran away from NYC to Canada?
Klein whines about the impact of school closures on minorities and other perceived victims, without acknowledging that school closures injured every healthy privileged child as well. Like any good socialist, Klein’s solution to the problems created by her bone headed fake public health policies are to spend more funny money on things like school ventilation, outdoor education programs, and an endless stream of tests and masks. Klein implies in her book that only the unvaccinated get sick and die from COVID. She never acknowledges vaccine failure. Shame.
Incredibly, Klein blames people like Wolf and Steve Bannon for her own intellectual failings, saying “In an odd way, their over-the-top conspiracies fed our overcredulity; their ‘question everything’ led to many of us not questioning enough”. Read that again: she blames “conspiracy theorists” who accurately denounced propaganda for making her so willing to blindly believe the government. Question everything? All she had to do was question something, anything. Instead she allowed herself to be led by emotion.
Klein says of Naomi Wolf, “I tracked her new alliances with some of the most malevolent men on the planet, the ones sowing information chaos on a mass scale and gleefully egging on insurrections in country after country”. Um, that can only be a description of the CIA and the Zionist entity more broadly. Yet Klein sides with the CIA and Israel on the question of COVID, and presumably the rest of their social platform as well. What has Klein written about that magnum opus of shock doctrine, or trauma based mind control, the assassination of JFK?
She debunks the threat of vaccine passports by reducing them to harmless QR codes, contrasting them with the vast digital surveillance powers of our cell phones, without noting the obvious possibility that the two things could be combined for “safety” and “convenience”. She also fails to note the threat of segregation on the basis of vaccination, but obviously that’s because she was in favor of segregating people who did not trust the philanthropists in the U.S. military who were busy passing homogenized talking points down through every organ of state and corporate power.
Klein sums up Wolf’s denunciation of the vaccine passports as “comparing a vaccine app to the Holocaust”. Spoiler alert: if Naomi Klein ever writes a book about the murder of 6 million Jews, it will contain just as much evidence as she offers for the benefits of masking, isolation, and COVID vaccines. As in, none whatsoever.
[Also shout out to C.J. Hopkins, tell your next Kraut benchfrau that they squished Hoess’ balls to get enough testimony to lie about 4 million murder victims at Auschwitz for 44 years, even as the New York Times had been crying about “6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism” in eastern Europe ever since 1900. Tell her that there is no forensic evidence of the holocaust but there is forensic evidence that SARS CoV 2 was made in a laboratory by Nazis. This will ensure your flawless retrial.]
I read Naomi Wolf for a while during the COVID pandemic before concluding that she was not a trustworthy information source. Like Klein, Wolf is supposedly an anti Zionist Jew. But I think these two Naomis have more in common with each other than they do with anyone else. They are, indeed, doppelgangers. And they are both full of shit. They both run interference for globalism. What’s the explanation? Are both blinded by something they share in common? Is Klein too stupid to recognize that she is a raging hypocrite? Or are they both hiding something from us?
In Klein’s political cosmology, the good guys are “progressives” while the bad guys are “far right capitalists” (or else a “neoliberal economic hegemony”). In her usage, progressives are an alliance between liberals and leftists. She identifies herself as a leftist, and Wolf as a former liberal. Her main thesis is that liberals are now abandoning leftism and so threatening the mighty progressive edifice. They are stealing the left’s own vocabulary. At this point, we might as well underline Klein’s absolute idiocy by pointing out that the first symbol of the progressives was a fasces, and it was their eugenic ideals that inspired Adolf Hitler, the National Socialist. Twin fasces still dominate the U.S. House of Representatives, that precious bastion of democracy. Hillary Clinton lost to Trump with a fascist slogan: “stronger together”.
Klein complains that former progressives are fleeing down the rabbit hole to the “mirror world” because of social media censorship and cancel culture. No kidding! Jewish leftists like her spent generations telling Americans that freedom of speech and choice were the highest values of democracy. Now they claim that freedom of speech and choice are the greatest dangers to democracy (and its Siamese twin, public health). For example, Klein says “The spread of lies and conspiracies online is now so rampant that is threatens public health, and, quite possibly, the survival of representative democracy.” All I can say is GOOD RIDDANCE because the United States is a constitutional republic and democracy is the veil of empire.
Klein asks, “What is it called when a society divides into two warring factions, both of which are convinced that the other has been replaced by doppelgangers?” I know the answer, it’s called a color revolution. So why is Klein exacerbating this societal divide by attacking her dopey alt right doppelganger with stale socialist propaganda? Why doesn’t Klein take on someone like John Ioannidis if she’s so damned enlightened about virology research and public health? Why settle for arguing with her funhouse reflection? Naomi Wolf is Naomi Klein’s strawman.
I mean, Klein is supposed to be a dissident journalist, right? Why does she have nothing to say about the science of biological “defense” engineering? Nothing about virology or gain of function research? Nothing about Project DEFUSE, Daszak, Baric, Fauci, and Bat Lady? Nothing about HIV glycoprotein motifs in the SARS2 binding architecture? Nothing about the 19 nucleotide match to a Moderna oncology patent?
Perhaps Klein is aware of the hypocritical absurdity she is offering up Doppelganger. It’s what the book is all about: how she and Wolf, however different they may seem, are actually twins as a consequence of some kind of diabolical information war. It is a “revelation of the method”. The twin Naomis are designed to polarize opinion, despite the fact that they actually represent the same ultimate interests. Klein coyly alludes to her oxymoronic con job, writing of her first commercial success:
“I was kind of full of it. I had been very deliberate about how No Logo was designed and positioned. Having spent years studying effective corporate branding, I wanted my first book to be fluent in the same language. I somehow convinced one of the top graphic designers in the world, Bruce Mau, to do the design, well before I even had a publisher. The cover was sleek and all black—shocking at the time—and the title itself was an instantly iconic red, white, and black logo.”
“All of this attention to packaging and style was, I told myself, a wink—better yet, a hack of the world of corporate branding. It also worked: No Logo sold over a million copies, beyond anything I could have imagined. And as I toured continuously for two years, I kept playing with the idea of being an anti-brand brand. […] “I ginned up a No Logo logo and taped it to my water bottle.”
I am so sick of reading this woman and her Olympian levels of cognitive dissonance. I will refrain from calling her a bad name on the off chance that she believes what she says. But I’m never going to read her work again. She blames angry white people for all of America’s problems, despite acknowledging that they have every reason to be pissed off. She just can’t understand why they would turn to Trump after 8 years of broken Obama promises. She can’t understand why they don’t want a senile pariah named Joe Biden pushing experimental vaccines from the White House while banging on his high chair for WWIII. If only the angry white people thought about it more carefully, they would realize that Democrats are the only chance to achieve true socialism and health in America. It’s not like it’s some kind of pre gamed government conspiracy - although watch out for Steve Bannon, that guy wants to rule the world.
Klein calls America’s return to Constitutional values “flipping fascist” while defending the pharmaceutical industrial complex run by dotgov. Klein is one of those very special individuals who thinks that fascism is defined by hatred of women, Jews, blacks, foreigners, poors, disableds, and queers, while ignoring the politico economic definition of fascism completely. America has been literally fascist ever since the progressives got their central bank. They celebrated their victory in WWII by putting a fasces reverse from FDR’s head on the dime, and flooding United States R&D with former Nazis: the same people who have been working on germ warfare for the last two generations. Klein defends their vaccines and their talking points while calling liberals the new fascists. Meanwhile she claims to come from an “ancient tribe”.
Klein and I would seem to agree on many things. I am a liberal, and she is a leftist. In my world view, the biggest problem is the supremacist religion that Klein claims as her ethnicity, and in Klein’s world view, the biggest problem is the color of my skin. That’s why she capitalizes Black but not white, and talks about “antiracism”, because she is a proponent of Critical Race Theory, along with every other leftist ideology. That means that she is the genocidal racist, whereas I am merely a philosopher. I can prove that she is wrong while she complains that words have lost all meaning.
As an example of Klein’s linguistic philosophy, she praises Greta Thunberg for literally saying “Blah blah blah” over and over again at a climate conference, writing “Greta had found a way not only of critiquing language but also of protecting language”. Perhaps that explains why I am only halfway through Klein’s book and simply enraged at her endless pilpul that never even bothers to define terms. I also appreciate how Klein calls “mass formation psychosis” a “made-up term” without apparently noticing that “made-up term” is a pleonasm.
We didn’t steal your words from you, Klein. You stole ours from us, and that’s why you don’t even know what they mean. If your own vocabulary has lost all meaning to you, then you were wrong about everything in the first place. Hi Naomi, it’s you, you’re the problem, it’s you. You’re the one who fell into the crypto fascist mirror world. We liberals stayed true to our values. But you just kept pointing your finger.
Klein says, out of all vocabulary, “There is one thing we must never surrender, and that is the language of anti-fascism. The true meanings of ‘genocide’ and ‘apartheid’ and ‘Holocaust,’ and the supremacist mindset that makes them all possible.” Well, if she knows what genocide is, then let’s hear her opinion on CRT and the Great Replacement of white people. If she knows what a holocaust is, then let’s hear her opinion on the Jewish god who requires it. If she knows what a supremacist mindset is, then let’s hear what she has to say about Semitism. Hilariously, she defines these words as “an entire cosmology built around claims of superior bodies, superior immune systems, and superior babies, bankrolled by supplement sales, bitcoin, and prenatal yoga”. Jesus F. Christ. She has no idea what fascism is! As proof, she calls a California cop evicting a wildfire survivor from a public park “ecofascism”.
Klein’s only solid ideological basis is her Judaism. She believes that mankind needs to be collectivized to be free. She cries out against Zionism in Israel while dreaming of the Communist end of history. She is controlled opposition. She says of Judaism, “it’s probably best not to impose our values on biblical stories”. I agree, which is why we should recognize that the Bible centrally justifies Jewish ethnic and racial supremacy. Instead, Naomi describes her Biblical Jewish namesake as “a bit of a hustler, doing what it took to get by in a broken system, protecting her people’s future at all costs”. Here is Klein admitting her true identity. She is a merciless progenitor of the coming Messiah(s), and her liberality is a thin disguise. She pines for the great reset.
Klein takes things on faith - the Holocaust, the safety of emergency use vaccines, the inevitability of a climate catastrophe caused by carbon emissions. Anyone who disagrees with all the things that leftists are unable to prove is called a “denier”. But reason and language are actually on our side - word games are their dearest tool.
[P.S. - Klein furthermore accuses the “hard right” of “pathologizing trans youth”. Let’s think about that for a moment. Who is encouraging kids to consider the possibility that they were born in the wrong body, and telling them that a lifetime of drugs and surgical intervention can make them well? THAT is the essence of pathologization and it is the foundation that both transphobia and trans activism are build upon. Who uses the term “gender dysphoria” to describe a kind of mental illness? Again, THAT is pathologization. And it is the vocabulary of leftists.]
[P.P.S. I feel like I have just written ten thousand words and I have only covered the first half of Naomi’s book. It would be a lot easier if she didn’t commit a logical fallacy every other sentence. Keep your eye out for part II, unless I get tired of being trolled.]
Another thing Klein and Wolf share in common is that they are both grifting off the scamdemic.
Really looking forward to Part II!
Thanks Gay Troll. I hope Ms Klein enjoys your critique as much as I did!